Which of the following maneuvers might typically incur a higher penalty during judgment?

Excessive spurring is often penalized more heavily during competitions because it indicates a lack of control and finesse from the rider. In equestrian disciplines, the use of spurs is meant to encourage the horse to respond more effectively, and when spurring is applied excessively, it can lead to discomfort or distress for the horse. This not only disrupts the harmony between horse and rider but can also negatively impact the overall performance, making it less pleasing to watch. Judges look for a partnership marked by subtlety and respect for the horse, and excessive use of spurs is seen as a failure to maintain that ideal.

While incorrect gait, evading the bit, and loss of forward motion are indeed serious issues in judging, they may be seen as indicative of a training or communication problem rather than an outright disregard for the horse's well-being. Excessive spurring, on the other hand, clearly reflects poor riding technique and potential harm to the horse, which is why it typically incurs a higher penalty.